Control routines

Load control

A load control object is constructed as follows:

auto lc = Ikarus::LoadControl(nonlinearSolver, numLoadSteps, {loadFactorStartValue, loadFactorEndValue});

• nonlinearSolver is a nonlinear solver, e.g., Newton-Raphson method, trust-region method, etc.
• numLoadSteps is the number of load steps.
• loadFactorStartValue is the value of the load factor at the beginning of the simulation.
• loadFactorEndValue is the value of the load factor at the end of the simulation.

The load control is started with the run() method, i.e., for the above-mentioned example:

lc.run();

Obtaining information from control routines

The load control is an observable object, i.e. one can subscribe to the messages of the load control method. To read further on the implementation of observer patterns in Ikarus, see here.

The following messages are available:

enum class ControlMessages { 
  BEGIN,
  CONTROL_STARTED,
  CONTROL_ENDED,
  STEP_STARTED,
  STEP_ENDED,
  SOLUTION_CHANGED,
  END 
};

Path-following techniques

A general routine based on the standard arc-length method is included, which uses a scalar subsidiary function to impose a constraint on the non-linear system of equations. The previously mentioned LoadControl method can also be recreated using this technique. For more details on the standard arc-length method, see, among others, the works of Wempner¹, Crisfield², Ramm³ and Riks⁴ among others. A path-following object is constructed as follows:

auto alc = Ikarus::PathFollowing(nr, load_steps, stepSize, pft);

where nr is a Newton-Raphson solver which considers a scalar subsidiary function and is defined by

auto nr = Ikarus::makeNewtonRaphsonWithSubsidiaryFunction(nonLinOp, std::move(linSolver));

and pft is the desired path-following technique. Three different path-following techniques are included, namely

• Standard arc-length method
• Load control method (as a subsidiary function under this generalized implementation)
• Displacement control method (uses a vector of indices which are all controlled by a same stepSize).

These can be invoked by defining

auto pft = Ikarus::StandardArcLength{};
auto pft = Ikarus::LoadControlWithSubsidiaryFunction{};
auto pft = Ikarus::DisplacementControl{controlledIndices};

Note

The default path-following type is the Ikarus::StandardArcLength{}. In the current implementation, it is assumed that the external forces are given by \(F_{ext} = F_{ext}^0\lambda\) such that $$ -\frac{\partial \mathbf{R}}{\partial \lambda} = F_{ext}^0 $$ An implementation for a general non-linear \(F_{ext} = F_{ext}^0\left(\mathbf{D},\lambda\right)\) is an open task.

In order to create an own implementation for the scalar subsidiary function, the user has to create a struct with the following three member functions:

void evaluateSubsidiaryFunction(SubsidiaryArgs& args) const;
void initialPrediction(NonLinearOperator& nonLinearOperator, SubsidiaryArgs& args);
void intermediatePrediction(NonLinearOperator& nonLinearOperator, SubsidiaryArgs& args);

For each Newton-Raphson iteration, the function evaluateSubsidiaryFunction(SubsidiaryArgs& args) is used to evaluate the subsidiary function and its derivatives with respect to the displacement \(\mathbf{D}\) and the load factor \(\lambda\). The other two functions are used to specify a prediction for \(\mathbf{D}\) and \(\lambda\) for the initial step and for all the other intermediate subsequent load_steps, respectively.

SubsidiaryArgs is a struct which is defined as

struct SubsidiaryArgs {
  double stepSize; // (1)!
  Eigen::VectorX<double> DD; // (2)!
  double Dlambda{}; // (3)!
  double f{}; // (4)!
  Eigen::VectorX<double> dfdDD; // (5)!
  double dfdDlambda{}; // (6)!
};

1. User-desired step size
2. Vector of displacement increments
3. Increment in the load factor
4. Scalar value evaluated from the subsidiary function
5. Derivative of the subsidiary function with respect to the displacement increment
6. Derivative of the subsidiary function with respect to the load factor increment

An example for the standard arc-length method is shown below:

struct StandardArcLength {
    void evaluateSubsidiaryFunction(SubsidiaryArgs& args) const {
      if (psi) {
        const auto root = sqrt(args.DD.squaredNorm() + psi.value() * psi.value() * args.Dlambda * args.Dlambda);
        args.f          = root - args.stepSize;
        args.dfdDD      = args.DD / root;
        args.dfdDlambda = (psi.value() * psi.value() * args.Dlambda) / root;
      } else
        DUNE_THROW(Dune::InvalidStateException,
                   "You have to call initialPrediction first. Otherwise psi is not defined");
    }

    template <typename NonLinearOperator>
    void initialPrediction(NonLinearOperator& nonLinearOperator, SubsidiaryArgs& args) {
      auto linearSolver
          = Ikarus::LinearSolver(Ikarus::SolverTypeTag::d_LDLT);  // for the linear predictor step

      nonLinearOperator.lastParameter() = 1.0;  // lambda =1.0

      nonLinearOperator.template update<0>();
      const auto& R = nonLinearOperator.value();
      const auto& K = nonLinearOperator.derivative();

      linearSolver.factorize(K);
      linearSolver.solve(args.DD, -R);

      const auto DD2 = args.DD.squaredNorm();

      psi    = sqrt(DD2);
      auto s = sqrt(psi.value() * psi.value() + DD2);

      args.DD      = args.DD * args.stepSize / s;
      args.Dlambda = args.stepSize / s;

      nonLinearOperator.firstParameter() = args.DD;
      nonLinearOperator.lastParameter()  = args.Dlambda;
    }

    template <typename NonLinearOperator>
    void intermediatePrediction(NonLinearOperator& nonLinearOperator, SubsidiaryArgs& args) {
      nonLinearOperator.firstParameter() += args.DD;
      nonLinearOperator.lastParameter() += args.Dlambda;
    }

    std::string name = "Arc length";

  private:
    std::optional<double> psi;
  };

---

1. Gerald A. Wempner. Discrete approximations related to nonlinear theories of solids. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 7(11):1581–1599, 1971. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(71)90038-2. ↩

2. M.A. Crisfield. A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles “snap-through”. Computers & Structures, 13(1):55–62, 1981. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(81)90108-5. ↩

3. E. Ramm. Strategies for Tracing the Nonlinear Response Near Limit Points. In W. Wunderlich, E. Stein, and K.-J. Bathe, editors, Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis in Structural Mechanics, pages 63–89. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81589-8_5. ↩

4. E. Riks. The Application of Newton’s Method to the Problem of Elastic Stability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 39(4):1060–1065, 1972. doi:10.1115/1.3422829. ↩